(This video will be available to everyone for the next 72 hours. After that it will only be available to paid subscribers.)
One of the primary tools that the medical establishment, the media, and many politicians used to terrorize the general public and impose mandatory face masks, social distancing, lockdowns and vaccine mandates, was the COVID PCR Test. They kept throwing out scary numbers about supposedly increasing cases of COVID, all based primarily PCR Test results.
Myself and others, based on our research, knew back in the 1990s that the PCR Test was worthless for determining whether someone had HIV and that it was also worthless in general for trying to determine whether someone had a supposed viral infection.
When I learned that they were using this test to try to determine who had COVID – 19, I was shocked by this since this test had already been proven to be worthless! I was even more shocked by how many people believed the nonsense that they were being feed everyday by the news media! Most of the public was becoming terrified. They started wearing those stupid and worthless face masks everywhere as if a $2 mask would protect them from a deadly “virus”.
I saw it as my duty to try and warn the public. One of the things that I did was to write and direct a short 5-minute animation that explained the numerous flaws with the PCR Test. I wanted to create something that was nonthreatening and entertaining, while at the same time very informative. It is called: A Crash Course on The COVID PCR Test. Thousands of people have already viewed it.
This project was funded by Millions Against Medical Mandates (MAMM). They were able to fund 3 of my animations. The other 2 were: A Crash Course on COVID Vaccines. The 3rd and final one was: A Crash Course on Face Masks. I would like to produce more of these animations if some group or individual could fund them.
Any other supposed “pandemics” will again be used to traumatize the public into obedience. They will once again start talking about raising case numbers based on a bogus PCR Test.
The best way to stop future fake pandemics is by educating the public on just how absurd and worthless the PCR Test really is. This would remove the fear from people’s heart and they will stop falling for the hype! Please watch and share! Below are the references for that were used for this animation.
REFERENCES - A Crash Course On The Covid PCR Test
EMERGENCY USE
“Mandating products approved for emergency use violates federal and state law since Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) means the products are investigational and experimental. Federal and state law is very clear that mandates are illegal for EUA products. Both the RT-PCR test and all COVID vaccines are not FDA-approved; they are available under an EUA.” Children’s Health Defense Letter to California County Officials
TRANSMISSION
1. Scientists back in 1919 conducted multiple experiments in an attempt to prove person-to-person transmission of influenza in volunteers. This included transferring bodily fluids from patients with influenza to volunteers by placing these fluids in the eyes, nose, and throats on the volunteers. Despite multiple attempts, none of the volunteers became sick. This was a serious blow to the virus theory and casual transmission. Experiments to Determine Mode of Spread of Influenza - Rosenau, Milton J. August 2, 1919
2. A study of a 22-year-old woman who tested positive for Covid, but did not have any symptoms, found that of the 455 people she had contact with the previous five days, none of them tested positive for Covid! This study destroyed the notion of casual transmission by people deemed as asymptomatic. Most of the mainstream media did not a do story about this dramatic finding. People infected with COVID-19 who are asymptomatic (which is most people) do NOT spread COVID-19 Children’s Health Defense
3. “There is no significant risk of catching the disease when you go shopping. When we took samples from door handles, phones, or toilets it has not been possible to cultivate the virus in the laboratory on the basis of these swabs….” Professor Hendrick Streek, University of Bonn “Lockdown Lunacy - The Thinking Person’s Guide” by J.B. Handley Children’s Health Defense
4. Published science shows COVID-19 is NOT spread outdoors “Lockdown Lunacy - The Thinking Person’s Guide” by J.B. Handley Children’s Health Defense Children’s Health Defense
5. There’s no science to support the magic of a six-foot barrier - This report from the CDC shows that influenza and Covid-19 are very similar in terms of symptoms and the way they are spread. “Lockdown Lunacy - The Thinking Person’s Guide” by J.B. Handley Children’s Health Defense Children’s Health Defense
6. This report from the CDC shows that influenza and COVID-19 are very similar in terms of symptoms and the way they are spread. “Similarities and Differences between Flu and COVID-19” CDC Website
PCR TEST
1. According to an article in the NY Times, up to 90% of those who tested positive on a Covid PCR Test, should have been negative. Bombshell Report: 90% of Positive COVID-19 Tests Should Be Negative One America News Network, September 2, 2020
2. This report exposes the fact that the COVID PCR Test developed by a German company was not peer-reviewed and doctors and scientists have since challenged the reliability of this test. The results of the test can vary widely depending on the number of cycles that are run. There is no fixed standard provided by the makers of this new PCR Test, which means that any country can increase or decrease the number of positive COVID cases by adjusting the number of cycles any way they want. It is estimated that the number of cases of COVID could be reduced to less than 3% of the current numbers by simply reducing the number of cycles. In other words, 97% of the people who tested positive for COVID would in fact be negative if the standards were changed such that fewer cycles would be allowed. Coronavirus Scandal Breaking in Merkel’s Germany By F. William Engdahl 10 December 2020
3. Dr. Dave Rasnick on PCR: What It Is And What It Can And Cannot Do
4. “What do we mean when we say somebody has ‘tested positive’ for the Corona Virus? The answer would astound you. But getting this “answer” is like getting to a very rare mushroom that only grows above 200 feet on a Sequoia tree in the forbidden forest. I say that for dramatic effect, but also because I wound up, against all odds, finding it.”
5. Was the Covid-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus? Celia Farber Journalism April 7, 2020
DR. KARY MULLIS - Inventor of the PC Test
1. PCR Don’t Prove You’re Sick! (Kary Mullis PCR Inventor)
2. Dr. Kary Mullis Inventor of the PCR Test Used for COVID19 “PCR Does Not Tell You Are Sick”
3. Spiro - The Corona Test - Thoughts on PCR From Its Inventor Kary Mullis, HIV, AIDS, and More
4. Kary Mullis, PCR Test Inventor
5. PCR Nas Palavras Do Seu Inventor - Dr. Kary Mullis
TANZANIA
2. “DAR ES SALAAM (Reuters) - Tanzania has suspended the head of its national health laboratory in charge of testing for the coronavirus and ordered an investigation, a day after President John Magufuli questioned the tests’ accuracy. Magufuli said on Sunday the imported test kits were faulty as they had returned positive results on a goat and pawpaw -- among several non-human samples submitted for testing, with technicians left deliberately unaware of their origins.” Tanzania Suspends Laboratory Head After President Questions Coronavirus Tests Reuters May 4, 2020
3. “Tanzania’s President John Magufuli has dismissed imported coronavirus testing kits as faulty, saying they returned positive results on samples taken from a goat and pawpaw. On Saturday, Magufuli announced that he had placed an order for a herbal treatment for the coronavirus touted by the president of Madagascar. The herbal remedy, called “COVID Organics” and prepared by the Malagasy Institute for Applied Research, is made out of Artemisia, a plant cultivated on the Indian Ocean island of Madagascar.” Tanzania President Questions Coronavirus Kits After Animal Test Aljazeera May 3, 2020
COLLEGES
1. “Students who were forced to relocate during the spring were more likely to report COVID-19-related grief, loneliness, and generalized anxiety symptoms than students who did not, according to research from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston University’s School of Social Work, and McLean Hospital.” Here's How the COVID Lockdown Impacted College Students' Mental Health NBC Boston News
2. “Health association recommends twice-weekly testing for campuses that are reopening. Twin social distancing and mask policies are (cost) effective, a new study says.” The Value of Virus Mitigation By Colleen Flaherty January 4, 2021, Inside Higher Ed
3. “To Keep Campuses Safe, Some Colleges To Test Students For Coronavirus Twice A Week” Allison Aubrey August 15, 2020, NPR
4. Effective Immediately: Elevated Sanctions and Testing Times Two Times Per Week The University of Vermont
5. “Anyone who has had close contact with someone with COVID-19 should stay home for 14 days after their last exposure to that person.” “When can you be around others after you had or likely had COVID-19?” Centers for Disease Control
6. “Quarantining in a dorm room for two weeks makes for surreal start for Colorado College freshmen” The Colorado Springs Gazette
Bill,
I agree with you. Yes, I know that saying the PCR test is 90% false positive, implies that the other 10% is accurate. Of course, the test is 100% false positive!
Yes, I know that no COVID virus has ever been purified and proven to even exist. Therefore, there is nothing for the PCR test to be based on.
The reason why I presented it this way was because there is a massive debate regarding the virus theory. Many people are in love with the virus theory and get very upset at anyone who wants to take it away from them. For this presentation I chose not to go into that debate. It is a long and complicated thing to deal with. I only had six minutes for this video.
I don't think anyone could watch my video and go through references and walk away thinking that the PCR test is credible. I even shared a link to Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR, c clearly stated that his invention could not determine if someone has a viral infection. If most people can grasp just this much, that would be a very positive step in the right direction at breaking down the entire credibility of the PCR Test.
Thanks so much for your comments!
Hi Curtis, thanks for the reply.
But frankly, I am unimpressed with your arguments. You say, "For this presentation I chose not to go into that debate", however, this is inaccurate.
You HAVE entered the debate, on the side of the VIRUS PUSHERS.
What you CHOSE to do was to support the establishment, mainstream, allopathic, Rockefeller Medicine Paradigm.
What you CHOSE to do was to mislead people, because you here ADMIT that you know the truth!
Wow!!! Really?
You deliberately mislead people about a super important point despite that you know the truth? For what reason?
"Oh, we don't want to upset the virus lovers".
Oh yeah, OK man. That sounds all good.
Let's avoid //stopping the Genocide// at it's ORIGINS
because we don't want to seem impolite.
And I get it: You're friends with Bobby and hooked in to CHD.
You know what, I am friends with Bobby (not close, met a few times), and I TOO used to work for CHD (I was "in the network").
But Curtis, I QUIT when I realized the path they were on,
and I was hired as a paralegal, NOT to give legal advice.
I wasn't being heard, and I saw the RIDICULOUS ways these CHD lawsuits were being waged.
...So I quit.
PEOPLE ARE DYING, Curtis because of this FAKE PANDEMIC,
because of all of these harmful Countermeasures.
And Bobby Kennedy is pushing, what Debbie Lusignan called,
the CORE, FOUNDATIONAL LIE of the COVID Hoax:
The purported existence of the Big Scary Death Plague Virus.
(which has never been shown to exist).
http://TinyURL.com/NoRecordFound
And Your Friend Bobby Kennedy is telling people to eat and ACUTELY TOXIC POISON, LITERAL INSECTICIDE (Ivermectin) as a "cure" for a 100% Fake Disease!
Bobby Kennedy is promoting the VIRUS FRAUD
(and you also are kind of playing along, not making any waves, don't want to offend),
WHILE HE (Bobby) disingenuously pretends to be the opposition.
This is important, Curtis. Do we really have any time to waste, WATERING DOWN and CORRUPTING the truth, taking the time to make a video to MISLEAD children, that COVID PCR *might be* 10% accurate at detecting "the COVID virus", something never shown to exist?
I'm sorry, I don't get it.
I want to say to you,
C'mon man. Grow a backbone.
Take a moral stand.
If Bobby doesn't like it, then TOUGH LUCK.
That's his loss.
**I** will stand with you,
if YOU will stand for truth.
Please & Love,
in TRUTH
BH
🙏❤️😊🙇♂️🌹
PS: You say the funding for this came from MAMM: Millions Against Medical Mandates.
This looks like a CHD program to me. Am I right?
2:15 "Some studies show that false positives with the covid PCR test can be as much as 90%"
I agree with Curtis because it is based on studies, not someone's preferred opinion. The video didn't say exactly what you want it to say Bill? Then I'm looking forward to seeing your superior version, who's stopping you? A claim of 100% false might lose a lot of the intended audience but let's find out eh?
By the way, the CDC/FDA PCR instructions 24 times specify a Cycle threshold (Ct) of 40x while Fauci is on video saying anything over 35x is "just dead nucleotides, period". https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
Personally I'm still looking for the science showing the 32 base pair sequence amplified in PCR is not also present in cold, flu & pneumonia viruses (assuming "viruses" are not actually just debris from dying cells). Some friends have seen that science evidently because they have 100% faith in the narrative but I missed the memo.
Hi Gary,
> I agree with Curtis because it is based on studies, not someone's preferred opinion.
What studies are you referring to, which suggest that the COVID PCR is meaningful?
Did you know that the Corman/Drosten PCR was created without any actual clinical specimen?
QUOTE: "In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community. We report here on the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens." ENDQUOTE
Source: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045
Did you know that the CDC PCR test for COVID has the same problem?
QUOTE: "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen."
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
Yes, they used a MOCK CLINICAL SPECIMEN (along with some Manufactured Metagenomic Magic = Malarkey) in both cases.
We do not have a validated COVID PCR, because that requires a clinical specimen of SARS-CoV-2 which is necessary to calibrate the test.
ALL COVID PCR tests are 100% meaningless.
This is not "someone's preferred opinion".
If you are asserting the there is ANY meaningful COVID serum test (PCR, Lateral Flow, Rapid Test, Antibody Test, Antigen test, etc) which has been validated (or alternatively, calibrated) to real world Certified Reference Materials, then please send it my way: WilliamAHuston@gmail.com or WilliamAHuston@protonmail.com
> A claim of 100% false might lose a lot of the intended audience
So we should spread falsehoods, because if we told the truth, we'd "lose some people"?
I would never claim that COVID PCR produces 100% false positives. Because that implies that a "True COVID positive" might be a meaningful result of the test. What I say is the COVID PCR is 100% Bogus. End of story.
I don't claim about Ct counts. The COVID PCR is unvalidated, uncalibrated, and 100% bogus.
> Personally I'm still looking for the science showing the 32 base pair sequence amplified in PCR
As Dr Kevin Corbett says here, those 32 base pairs are "not based in anything in the real world. There is no underpinning material basis" for those amplicons. SARS-CoV-2 is a computer model. https://odysee.com/@OracleFilms:1/Dr.-Kevin-Corbett-Part-1_HD:f
> & pneumonia viruses (assuming "viruses" are not actually just debris from dying cells).
A virus is defined as a "Replication-competent intra-cellular obligate parasites that cause cellular necrosis and symptomatic disease, which transmit between hosts via natural modes of exposure."
Those things either exist or they don't. You don't get to change the definition.
The "debris from dying cells" is what is scooped up during the alleged (bogus) "Sanger Sequencing" process for the alleged "virus genome". The individual "reads" become "contigs" once we apply some Metegonomic Assembly Tools, like Blast, Trinity, Megahit.
But AFAIK, no one is suggesting that "dying cell debris" is pathogenic. Viruses are *defined* to be pathogenic. So therefore "dying cell debris" are not viruses.
Pro Tip: When you suit up to fight the enemy but they're not really in sight yet, don't let your ferocious testosterone cause you to turn and spear the guys next to you on your side.
How would describe "our side"?
My side is the side of truth.
I'm fascinated by people who, like Curtis, make the argument that telling lies is necessary, because the people aren't ready, we're going to lose our audience, etc etc. I don't get that.
Let me see if I can try to be clear here:
PCR is fucking fraud.
But I arrived at that conclusion because I figured it out by gathering some information, not because someone on the internet tried to make me fear being criticized if I don't state precisely his way of saying it.
BH: > "What studies are you referring to, which suggest that the COVID PCR is meaningful?"
Whatever the study referred to in the video is, where presumably they concluded some 10% of PCR can be valid, probably would be good to find out who ran that, and how, I'm just too lazy to at the moment.
Could your message be more effective not skewering those most likely to agree with your points? Many have informative content, and I appreciate those.
It's a great video because you show these con artists' propaganda techniques and their belief system. And then you have students challenge the propaganda in a very clever, subtle way. This is the best way to at least plant some doubt in the believers' minds. And I also agree it was a very good idea not to bring up the debate about the existence of the virus because like you say people just aren't ready for that!
Indeed these tests provide an aura of legitimacy that enables the medical cartel to pull the big con. Listen to Turfseer’s hit song THE TESTING TRAP at https://soundcloud.com/turfseer/the-testing-trap
There's a new church in town. Watch CHURCH OF THE PANDEMIC MIND. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/church-of-the-pandemic-mind
BONUS: Free Download. THE ALTERNATIVE COVID-19 NARRATIVE HANDBOOK. A Collection of useful links. Get it here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-alternative-covid-narrative-handbook
Subscribe to Turfseer's Newsletter. Songs, music videos and much more
Thanks! You are very insightful as always!.
Thanks! You are very insightful as always!.
Beautiful song Turfseer
This video misses the mark, BIGLY.
1:30 "tests that are not *completely* reliable"?
2:30 "COVID PCR *can* produce up to 90% positives???
C'mon man. You can do better than this!
The COVID PCR is 100% BOGUS.
ALL POSITIVES ARE FALSE!
The Corman/Drosten PCR was created **without access to actual certified viral isolates**!
Ref: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045
The CDC's PCR was ALSO created without actual viral isolates!
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
You can't create a machine to detect elephants, without an ACTUAL REFERENCE ELEPHANT with which to calibrate your instrument!
Or a better analogy would be a UNICORN Detector. (Because Unicorns are fictitious, just like the alleged "sars-cov-2"). Without an actual REFERENCE UNICORN, the Unicorn Detector is ABSOLUTELY MEANINGLESS!
Say that in PLAIN ENGLISH PLEASE!
Thank you.
Thank you for the courage to put yourself out there in the public eyes but you are trying to ride both sides of the fence SMH...The Rt-Pcr is the basis for the entire Plandemic it is a scientific tool not a tester. Even if it was a test there is no gold standard(an actual virus) to compare it to and the cdc said itself that the test cannot tell the difference between the flu virus and the new SARS-CoV-2 virus(https://www.cdc.gov/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html) how could that be possible using dna samples if they actually had a real new pathogenic virus? Even if pathogenic viruses did exist there is no proof of contagion and the vaxx shots do not stop transmission and or severe illness/death they even admit that so what is the real point of a so called testing? Maybe to deposit toxic poisons/chemicals like nanoparticles that there is evidence of ? https://www.bitchute.com/video/Nr038F6p2e0u/ ...that should have been mentioned in your video. The bottom line is an issue/challenge can never truly be resolved no matter what it is without addressing the root cause! The public acceptance/indoctrination of the germ theory and more specifically of the existence Pathogenic viruses of the root cause of the world tragic situation we are currently in. Please stop playing a role in the hopeless treatments that the pro-vaxx crown/neutral is straddling the fence with and fully join the no pathogenic virus side which is truly the only side that will truly free or minds by addressing the real root cause of this! The sooner enough of the world wakes up and stands up against this totalitarian fraud and all it measures/mandates the faster we can put this passed us. I know you probably mean well but you have to pick a side my brother the straddling the fence days are over. Peace