Mar 24Liked by Curtis Cost

Great interview!

Expand full comment

Thanks Curtis & Tiffany for this mind blowing interview and bringing this to light! Absolutely crazy to hear what these women had to experience, some still are or will in the future; the men as well!

I feel that the men probably don't talk as much because they are probably embarrassed or that if they do they will appear weak. No one should blame themselves for the choices that they made and should seek help.

Also thanks Curtis for interviewing Tiffany because it let's people know that their voices can be heard and that they can get help. Many have felt alone as a result of this and it's great to know that they don't have to.

Expand full comment

Michele, If calling me a shill is your answer to what is actually going on I think you need to think deeper and not take everything some expert says as gospel. I have been in the vaccine risk aware movement for many years, long before Covid but Covid has opened my eyes to many more psyops that are going on and the real reasons for Rockefeller medicine and creation of narratives that allow the psychopaths to gain control. If people don’t wake up then they deserve what they get. Sorry if I don’t agree with everything every “expert” says to satisfy other people’s world view. I’m seeking truth so I want truth that is not subsidized by corporate interests.

Expand full comment

FYI Robin Monotti+Dr Mike Yeadon+Cory Morningstar Channel, [29/11/21 11:10 PM]


You’ll be aware that one of our assiduous researchers noticed a short while ago that adverse events are not occurring randomly throughout the batches & lots of vaccines made by a given manufacturer.

Instead, it appears that just 5% of the batches / lots are associated with almost all the deaths.

Given the tight requirements of consistency associated with an authorised product, it’s absolutely impossible that this is a chance event.

No: this is I regret to say unequivocal evidence of malfeasance.

The new (to me) observations in this document are absolutely extraordinary & upsetting.

In brief, they’ve uncovered striking evidence of what’s called DOSE RANGE-FINDING for lethal outcomes.

There are 4-5 different sets of batches / lots of the Pfizer vaccine, deployed in the USA, which show this DRF effect.

Worse, there is a quiet period between each of the lethal batches, the purpose of which is clearly BASELINE ESTABLISHMENT.

You really don’t need a vivid imagination to infer why this work has been done.

If you harboured any residual doubts about whether there is or not a depopulation agenda, this presentation destroys that doubt.

The final, chilling observation is that all three companies are doing similar, sinister studies.

They’re operating in such a way so as to not run over each other. When company A is deploying lethal batches, companies B & C are deploying only harmless batches.

Best wishes


Dr Mike Yeadon

Expand full comment

Different lots is why adverse reactions differ

Expand full comment

“How did a venom, a venom component called phospholipase A2, which was first ever discovered in a snake, how is it now in low levels of all chronically ill people?”

Expand full comment

Thank you. Yes it was noted early by a close friend in a UK women’s business group who were talking about severe menstrual problems. The BBC said not a problem as they all resolved themselves, unfortunately the BBC is compromised as are many and again have Gates and associates as investors. I’m interested as well, other than the spike proteins, what’s happening with these LNP going everywhere and what is that possibly doing...saying that I know others who have had worse outcomes from these jabs. I read a case recently where it was resolved as the person had a hysterectomy.....

Expand full comment
Mar 24·edited Mar 24

Check out Dr Bryan Ardis research on venoms

Expand full comment

I’m not disputing adverse reactions. That is so as per clinical trials, after market data- The Pfizer documents, and VAERS analysis. What I am questioning is shedding. Not demonstrated in any database for adverse reactions. Surveys from individuals is not proof.

Expand full comment

The burden of proof is on you to prove something is happening. No one can prove something isn’t happening. You are making the claim that shedding is occurring. I see no scientific proof just surveys. There is scientific proof of harm from the vaccines in the clinical trials, after market data and VAERS analysis but no such proof has been presented for shedding. Until such proof is shown this question is still open.

Expand full comment

I agree the adverse reactions are most likely caused by the vaccine as there is evidence for that but not for the contagion of shedding. There are too many confounding factors involved. Proximity has never been proven as a scientific reason for symptoms. Your interview with Christine Massey has demonstrated that. If you want more explanation on this follow Dr Sam Bailey, Dr Mark Bailey, Dr Andy Kaufman, Dr Tom Cowan, Alec Zeck and they can point you in the direction for the lack of proof of this type of contagion.

Expand full comment

That is not proof of shedding. Many people in Hiroshima became ill or died after the atom bomb but I would say they did not catch anything from anyone. There are many reasons people in proximity get similar symptoms like being exposed to the same toxins, stressors, trauma, deficiencies etc. You can’t say that the symptoms were caused by one thing.

Expand full comment

Thank you for bringing this issue to light. The shots are causing so many egregious symptoms. However there is no evidence of shedding. This is not a scientific analysis. There are many reasons people become symptomatic besides being in close proximity to a vaccinated person. This is just another narrative of contagion. My husband and daughter both had stiff necks and about a day later I got one also. That doesn’t mean I “caught” it from them or they caught it from eachother.

Expand full comment