4 Comments
Oct 9, 2022Liked by Curtis Cost

Things we've NEVER seen before -- and the only anomaly in our life prior to these horrendous sufferings? The covid injectables. WHY IS THERE NO THRESHOLD FOR BAD OUTCOMES TO THE JABS?

If those who mandated the covid jabs and protocols (NIH, NIAIDs, FDA, CDC, CMS, DOD) even cared a little, the data they've collected so far should have set off some alarms by now. WHY DON"T THEY CARE TO CONTROL THE SUFFERING AND FINALLY SET A THRESHOLD and pullback from further deployment of this harming protocol?

If our government CARED, Congress would investigate.

If those responsible for giving the shots cared (such as, drugstores and hospitals), wouldn't someone say something? Wouldn't even one drugstore staffer or hospital staffer enquire to the government about how to avoid complications and injuries? WHY NOT?

WHY is there still an Emergency Use Authorization in effect when the "pandemic" is over?

WHY are American taxdollars paying for an additional round of vaccines for a so-called virus that has passed through the population, and per virologists' own explanations, has mutated to be different from the original forms of covid that the new "vaccines" address. New vaccines for old viruses -- isn't that a waste of money when so many Americans need financial assistance just to address the cost of injuries received from the first 21 months of covid "vaccine" rollout?

The suffering is shocking, sickening, haunting. Even if these occurrences -- miscarriages, baby weakness and death, youngsters developing heart failure, athletes dying, skyrocketing incidents of blood clots, nervous system failures, rapid cognitive decline, infertilty -- weren't occurring in the footprints of the covid jabs, WHY IS THERE NO ATTEMPT TO GET A HANDLE ON THEM FROM HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITIES, THE RESPONSIBLE PUBLIC HEALTH GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, OR CONGRESS? WHY DON'T THEY CARE?

Even if they desire to claim the "vaccines" aren't to blame, don't they CARE that these things are happening?

Well, clearly, they don't care.

What we need to find out is WHY they don't care.

=====

My own hypothesis about the tragic "spinners" is a bit complex. First, they look like they hear or feel or sense something around them, right? I would think that would parallel reactions by victims of radiation/frequency weapon deployment. When the victims collapse, their bodies look like the animal victims of venomous snake bites. Since there is no transparency from government or Pharma regarding the contents of the covid injectables, we still do not know what is in them which leads to speculation like mine -- which is, could there be nano encapsulated venom in the shots which is released when the host is bombarded with particular frequencies, resulting in rapid poisoning?

I pray those responsible for this nightmare scenario will soon be stopped.

Expand full comment
Oct 9, 2022Liked by Curtis Cost

"What horror! A horror movie come to life. High crimes against humanity! One day the bottom will drop out. We must push back."

'10letters.org' Sign the letters and mail them to the attorney general and the governor!

TAKE ACTION!

Expand full comment

This is a genocidal holocaust, which the videos & photos powerfully demonstrate. Great article Curtis. Capturing the Pearson Sharp OAN video was especially impactful.

Expand full comment

The main impediment to stopping this revolves around the courts. Even the most open-minded judges have not grasped the concept that a monopoly has been granted to the CDC and the WHO as to their theory that the novel SARS-Cov-2 virus has been proven to exist. These theories have never been vetted by outside skeptics because the mainstream theory is sancrosanct--you cannot question it or else you will be accused of spreading medical misinformation.

The appeal to a majority "scientific" consensus opinion inherently violates the Constitution's right to free speech. Nonetheless if there was one judge who allowed questioning of the consensus theory on the grounds that the original study to determine the existence of the virus was fundamentally flawed, inadequate or simply fraudulent, they would order a "proper" study to make a definitive interpretation.

Skeptics would still be forced to play by the rules of "virology," but the study would not be based on one or a few patients as it was done in China. Nor would a computer simulation be "proof" that the virus exists. No, it would naturally have to be a massive study with a control group (which of course was not done when the mainstream virologists came to their conclusions which brought economic ruin to millions not to mention all the deaths from the killer jabs).

One such proposal has been introduced by Dr. Sam Bailey along with other signatories in which a real clinical study can be done to prove or deny the claims of the mainstream consensus view..

The proposed study entitled "Settling the Virus Debate," can be found here: https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/

Expand full comment